Which step is NOT part of the strategies for addressing burglary cases?

The identification of the burglarized site is a fundamental step in addressing burglary cases as it allows investigators to assess the scene for evidence, determine how the crime was committed, and understand the context of the burglary. Documenting personal histories of suspects can be useful, but it is not a primary strategy when initially addressing a burglary case.

In contrast, collecting information on witnesses and detailed documentation of the time and circumstances of the burglary are crucial steps. Witnesses can provide vital information that may lead to identifying the suspect or understanding the sequence of events, while documenting the specifics of the incident can help in building a timeline, understanding the motive, or even substantiating claims during an investigation.

Therefore, focusing on personal histories of suspects does not fit as a primary strategy in the initial stages of investigating a burglary. Instead, the steps that are primarily involved typically revolve around gathering evidence and ensuring a thorough understanding of the crime scene and witness accounts.