Which one of the following is an effective strategy to mitigate workplace theft?

Prepare for the Nevada PI License Exam using our multiple choice quizzing platform with detailed explanations and hints. Enhance your learning with flashcards. Get set for success!

While discussing case studies on theft can provide awareness and stimulate conversation about theft, the most effective strategy among the given options to mitigate workplace theft is offering rewards for anonymous tips.

This approach encourages employees to report suspicious behavior without fear of retaliation, fostering an environment of accountability and vigilance. By providing monetary or other incentives for information that leads to preventing theft or identifying perpetrators, employees may feel more empowered to speak up. This can significantly contribute to a culture that prioritizes honesty and integrity, thereby reducing the likelihood of theft occurring in the first place.

Cultivating a culture of distrust is counterproductive; it may lead to decreased morale and increased turnover, which can further exacerbate theft issues. Regular discussions about case studies can be informative but may not directly lead to actionable behaviors among employees. Reducing supervision is generally seen as a risk factor that could increase theft occurrences, as it may give employees the opportunity to engage in dishonest behavior without being monitored.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy