Which motive for arson involves intending to eliminate competition?

The motive for arson that involves intending to eliminate competition is primarily characterized by the goal of financial gain. When a business or individual sets fire to a property with the intention of damaging or destroying a competitor's assets, this act is typically aimed at reducing competition in the marketplace. This can lead to increased market share or a stronger competitive position for the perpetrator, as the destruction of a rival’s property can inadvertently elevate the arsonist’s own business prospects.

In the context of business activities, organizations may engage in such unethical practices to remove threats posed by competitors, thereby creating a more favorable environment for their operations. This act is not only illegal but also demonstrates the lengths to which some individuals might go to secure their own financial interests at the expense of others in the industry.

The other motives listed, such as extortion, revenge, and destruction of evidence, do not align with the specific intention of eliminating competition. For instance, extortion pertains to coercing someone for profit, revenge focuses on personal vendettas, and destruction of evidence relates to covering up illicit activities, none of which directly involve the competitive strategy present in arson for financial gain.