Which is NOT considered a type of hearsay exception?

In the context of hearsay exceptions, the choice relating to expert opinions is considered correct because expert testimony is not classified as a hearsay exception. Hearsay refers to statements made outside of the courtroom that are offered as evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. These out-of-court statements are generally inadmissible unless they fall within an established exception.

Dying declarations, spontaneous declarations, and former testimony are all recognized exceptions to the hearsay rule.

Dying declarations apply in situations where a person makes a statement believing they are about to die, and it relates to the cause of their impending death. This exception is rooted in the assumption that a person makes truthful statements when they face imminent death.

Spontaneous declarations allow for statements made in the heat of the moment during a startling event, capturing the declarant's immediate reaction. This is based on the idea that such statements are unlikely to be fabricated.

Former testimony refers to statements made in previous legal proceedings that were under oath and where the parties had an opportunity to cross-examine the witness. This exception preserves the reliability of the testimony in future cases.

In contrast, expert opinions are derived from specialized knowledge, training, or experience rather than being an out-of-court statement that