When can evidence be excluded during arbitration proceedings?

Evidence can be excluded during arbitration proceedings when it is deemed irrelevant or immaterial. This principle is grounded in the fundamental objective of arbitration, which is to resolve the disputes based on pertinent facts and information. If evidence does not directly relate to the issues in question or does not have a significant bearing on the outcome of the case, it does not serve any useful purpose in the proceedings. Thus, arbitrators have the authority to dismiss such evidence, ensuring that the arbitration process is efficient and focused solely on the relevant aspects of the dispute.

In addition, relevance ensures that arbitrators are not burdened with unnecessary information, allowing for a streamlined process where only pertinent evidence contributes to the final decision. This promotes fairness and efficiency, allowing for quicker resolutions.