What must a judicially noticed fact fulfill to be accepted by the court?

A judicially noticed fact must fulfill the requirement of being generally known within the court's jurisdiction to be accepted by the court. This means that the information in question is so widely recognized that it does not require further proof or evidence; it is accepted as a matter of public knowledge. This could include well-established historical facts, geographical facts, or information that is commonly known within a specific area pertinent to the case.

For a fact to be judicially noticed, it must not be subject to reasonable dispute, which is the reason why this option does not align with the criteria for judicial notice; such facts are those that everyone accepts as true, devoid of debate. Unlike the other options, which introduce elements that distract from the clear definition of a judicially noticed fact, the requirement of being generally known within the jurisdiction is a foundational aspect of the concept, making it essential for acceptance in court.