What did the Miranda ruling establish regarding police interrogations?

The Miranda ruling, established by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), fundamentally changed the way law enforcement approaches the interrogation of individuals in custody. The ruling specifically mandates that individuals who are taken into custody and subjected to interrogation must be informed of their rights. This includes the right to remain silent and the right to consult with an attorney.

The purpose of this requirement is to protect the Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination. Without this notification, any confession or information obtained during the interrogation may be deemed inadmissible in court. This is crucial because it ensures that suspects are aware of their legal rights and can make informed decisions about whether to cooperate with law enforcement.

Understanding this ruling is essential, as it underscores the importance of due process and the protection of individuals against coercive interrogation tactics.