What defines 'past recollection recorded' in legal terms?

'Past recollection recorded' refers to a situation in legal contexts where a witness has difficulty recalling specific details about an event or information but has previously documented those details in a reliable manner. This legal concept allows for the introduction of a written account that reflects the witness's knowledge, provided that the witness can confirm that the record accurately reflects their past memory.

In this context, the answer emphasizing a document that a witness can no longer fully recall is correct because the key characteristic of 'past recollection recorded' is that it enables the admission of a written record as evidence when the witness cannot independently recall the information. This allows the court to consider the record as part of the testimony, which can help establish facts relevant to the case.

The other options do not align with the legal definition of 'past recollection recorded.' A real-time statement made during a trial does not involve the written documentation of past memories. General opinions about past events do not meet the criteria for a recorded recollection since they lack the specificity and reliability required. Lastly, a statement made under duress is not relevant to the concept, as it pertains to the circumstances under which a statement is made, rather than the nature of recollection or documentation.