What content is essential to include in a written statement after an interview?

A detailed account of events in the subject's own words is crucial in a written statement after an interview because it captures the primary narrative directly from the source involved. This firsthand account is often the most reliable, as it reflects the subject's perspective and recollection of the event. Including the subject's own words helps maintain the integrity of the information by avoiding alterations or interpretations that could occur when the investigator paraphrases or summarizes the account.

Furthermore, having a record in the subject’s own words is valuable for later analysis and can serve as essential evidence in a case. This approach ensures that the context, tone, and nuances of the subject's testimony are preserved, which can be critical in understanding the situation thoroughly.

In contrast, general impressions of the investigator, witness accounts from secondary sources, or the subject's personal opinions about the incident do not provide the same level of direct insight into what occurred. They could introduce bias or hearsay that may not accurately reflect the actual events or the perceptions of the individual involved. Thus, the focus should always be on obtaining a clear, accurate, and detailed account from the subject in their own words.