What aspect does ADR incorporate that litigation typically does not?

The correct choice highlights an essential characteristic of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) that sets it apart from traditional litigation. ADR encompasses a variety of methods, such as mediation and arbitration, which allow for more flexibility and creative approaches in resolving conflicts. This creativity can manifest through tailored solutions that address the unique needs and interests of the parties involved, which is not typically the case in litigation where outcomes are often confined by strict legal rules and precedents.

In the context of litigation, the process is heavily regulated with set procedures and timelines, which do not allow for much deviation or innovative problem-solving. ADR, on the other hand, empowers the parties to collaboratively explore options and devise solutions that might not be available through the court system.

Understanding this fundamental difference highlights why many individuals and organizations prefer ADR when they seek a more personalized and less adversarial approach to resolving their disputes.